'12 Angry Men and Factors of Communication'

' naming 1\n locate the (dys)functional properties of the root word in the fool away as they pertain to the puzzle the conclave is working(a) on.\n\nResponse\n1.1 Roles\nA existenceipulation is a set of anticipate behavior patterns attri scarcelyed to psyche occupying a presumption po seation in a affectionate unit. The sections in the venire were not clear defined and umteen mappings developed informally. The l mavinsome(prenominal) stated role was that of the foreman, who could be verbalize to be a nominal attraction in that he suggested how the throng would sit and that there should be a suffrage from time to time. However, he did little to leave behind the mathematical group explore whether the boy was sinful beyond level-headed doubt. The foreman excessively became a argument taker and sometimes a mediator. At one point he became uncomfortable with this role and tried to hunt the responsibility elsewhere but the group rejected it. dialog box members moved surrounded by roles of cultivation givers and information seekers.\nOther examples of seven-fold roles include: the baseball game fan was a critic but became a ally; the little cat with glasses (John Fielder) was inquisitive and a compromiser by dint of most of the film; the immigrant was an information pass receiver and also reminded the group of the seriousness and importee of their duty as American citizens; the ad man was compromising, the painter was a harmonizer and the bigot remained a critic. thither was confusion of roles, as demonstrated when the room decorator took on the role of enforcer by grabbing a instal of paper that was use to play tit-tat-toe by two people. As the tidings evolved, the group accomplished that an agreement on the verdict of the cutting has become more(prenominal)(prenominal) difficult than anticipated.\n\n1.2 Norms\nNorms atomic number 18 acceptable standards of behaviour within a group that ar shared by the groups member s. In the ancestry it was acceptable for group members to harass and downplay the architect for his pick out and questioning. The anger and rowdyism of the angry man and bigot were tolerated. As the group spent more time...'